THE 4TH OF JULY IN SAMARRA, IRAQ


Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.

Demand bold, new conservative leadership

By Whacker77 Posted in Comments (6) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

After Dennis Hastert's House seat was lost in a March special election, I warned Republicans that it was time to face some cold hard truths. Unless the political environment drastically improved, the elections of 2008 would be far worse than the disastrous results of 2006. Although I sounded a negative tone, I tried to remain optimistic and felt success, through a unified and conservative agenda, could still be achieved.

Unfortunately, I have come to the conclusion that there is now little chance for success, even by the most modest definition, in 2008. George W. Bush is one of the most unpopular presidents in modern American history. Republicans in the House and Senate are in complete disarray. Worst of all, the conservative base is completely unmotivated and unhappy. These three factors alone argue for a terrible, and possibly historic, electoral loss.

As I see it, George W. Bush may well be the modern day Herbert Hoover. To be clear, I am not attempting to make an economic parallel. Rather, I feel the failures of the Bush presidency may well leave the Republican Party in the shambles it found itself after the 1932 election. That year, a liberal president swept to power and brought with him huge majorities in both houses of Congress. As a result, the stage was set for a new age of socialism the likes of which the country had not seen.

Thanks to the incompetence and corruption of recent Republican Party, we stand at the beginning of a new socialist revolution in America. If you find this possibility hard to believe, just imagine what awaits us on January 20, 2009. Barrack Obama will, with some ease, have just won the presidency. Even worse, he will have brought with him even larger majorities in both the House and Senate. With a 75 seat majority in the House and a near-filibuster proof majority in the Senate, who will be there to stop the newest version of the New Deal?

Surprisingly, there are some conservatives who seem to relish the opportunity of complete Democrat control. Rush Limbaugh believes a unified liberal government will almost certainly lead to huge Republicans gains in 2010. After bashing Democrats for using the same old playbook, Rush and his compatriots seem to think the dusty game plan of 1994 will automatically work for Republicans once again. Be warned though. Democrats believed history would repeat itself in 2002 and they lost seats.

To those who see salvation in a loss, ask them this question. Why? Why should we believe Republicans, who learned nothing in 2006, be counted on to learn something after 2008. I know I don't. In fact, I believe Republicans will learn nothing from their impending defeat and will, in all likelihood, re-elect the same leadership who failed them these last few years. They will blithely blame the loss on President Bush and expect us to dutifully accept their explanation. If this group seemed willing to learn from their defeats, why did John Boehner and Roy Blunt retain their leadership positions?

So now the question for conservatives and Republicans is this. Where do we go from here? How do we rise like a phoenix from the ashes of this forthcoming disaster? First and most importantly, we must realize there is no quick fix. Thanks to the myriad of self inflicted problems, the Republican Party may well be in the wilderness for many, many years. Still, we can start down the road to redemption right now. Some of the cures may be painful, but nothing worthwhile comes easy.

1. We must demand new and, most importantly, conservative leadership in the House. John Boehner and Roy Blunt have failed us miserably. We need leadership, and back benchers for that matter, with a true conservative backbone. Now is time for Mike Pence and John Shadegg.

2. We must organize a bold conservative agenda based on big ideas. Conservatism must stand for more than picayune portable healthcare. Rely on the tenants Ronald Reagan used, but don’t rely solely on Reagan. Conservatism is more than one man.

3. We must, unfortunately, make a clean and decisive break from George W. Bush. His truest legacy may well be the destruction of the modern Republican Party. While did give us Roberts and Alito, he also gave us Democrat majorities and a toxic Republican brand.

*yawn* by tadams1138

Would have been excited but for the Bush bashing. History will remember him on what he did with foreign policy, like FDR, no matter how "toxic" you think Bush was domestically.

"Hey, I call 'em like I see 'em. I'm a whale biologist."

Bush bashing by Whacker77

Sorry you feel that way, but Bush bashing is claiming he invaded Iraq for oil, or saying he is a governed by the Bible and not the Constitution. George W. Bush may be many great things, but he has hurt the party immensely.

I should have chosen my words more carefully, but I don't appreciate the harsh criticism of Bush when he is what he said he would be back in 2000. I really don't appreciate the "his legacy will be horrible" stuff I've been reading around here (by a few). For all his domestic failings, it is hard to imagine another politician who ran in 2000 dealing with 9/11-present as well as Bush did.

"Hey, I call 'em like I see 'em. I'm a whale biologist."

Remember that little thing on Sept 11, 2001. When the President aced like a leader and decided to kick the a** of any terrorist and any regimes who sought to hurt America? That kind of killed their hopes in 2002, because America goes to the party that will protect them, not the party that wants to sit down and have tea time with terror. 2010 will be 2004, as soon as Americans get a whiff of BHO's economics.

Photobucket The trouble with our friend McCain isn't that he's ignorant, but that he knows so much that isn't so.

Good point about 9/11, but in the summer an early Fall of 2002 Democrats did exceptionally well in the polls. It was a late surge, to his credit, orchestrated by Bush.

Let's not lose sight of the forrest for the trees though. Bush's ineffective leadership, domestically and in Iraq, and the lack of leadership from the Congress has put the Republican Party in a horrible position.

I voted for Bush twice and did so with glee. Still, I don't understand why he gets a free pass from so many people. His poor leadership in the aftermath of Katrina, his out of control spending, his reliance on Rumsfeld in Iraq, and immigration are the very things that supposedly turned off conservative base voters. If that's the case, why shouldn't he be bear the brunt of the responsibility for the horrible shape of the party?

I voted for Bush twice, reluctantly, because I was told to be frightened of the big bad democrats. Well, I have decided to stop living my life based on fear. That dog won't hunt no more.

"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service